Prosecutors Charge Texas Businessman with IEEPA Violations Following Oil Transactions

A case presently on the docket in the Southern District of Texas is proving to be quite interesting and perhaps indicative of a new trend of Assistant US Attorneys going after individuals for International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) violations.  This case is not your typical laptop reexport case, however.

Billy L. Powell, Sr., a US citizen has been charged on a number of alleged violations of the IEEPA, the Iranian Transactions Regulations (ITR, now the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations or ITSR), and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) for exporting hundreds of shipments of pieces of oil equipment through his company Oil Services and Trading, Inc. to Iran.  Oil Services allegedly made these sales through the United Arab Emirates (UAE and the sales were used for the Foresight Driller-V offshore drilling platform, being managed by the Iranian Offshore Oil Company (IOOC), a subsidiary of the now-OFAC-designated Iranian National Oil Company (NIOC).  The Alborz rig is similarly another offshore drilling platform.  These sales were made over a span of almost 8 years ending in 2008.

The U.S. Attorney charges that between January 2006 and April 2008, Powell knowingly and willfully caused Oil Services to make and ship 325 sales of oil field equipment (valued at $3,179,625.05) from the U.S. through the U.A.E. to the Foresight and Alborz rigs in Iranian waters, without first having obtained OFAC authorization.

It will be interesting to see what becomes of this case.  There is little out there about Oil Services and Trading, Inc. Was it an alter ego of Mr. Powell? It is interesting that the case, if true, demonstrates a very egregious violation. It’s not every day that a U.S. company is relatively overly supporting the Iranian oil and gas industry.  While Iran’s oil and gas is generally one focus out of a number for the US government from a sanctions perspective, recent IEEPA cases seem to focus more on computer equipment.  There is an export-control element here too, but with a different industry. Will AUSAs be prosecuting more such cases in the future?

An international trade compliance (sanctions, export controls, customs, anti-corruption) and defense lawyer.

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Akrivis Law Group, PLLC
Washington, DC

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 109 other subscribers

This website aims to provide notes and commentary on international legal, business, and political developments in economic and other sanctions. It is intended solely for information and entertainment purposes and should in no way be construed as legal advice. Laws, regulations, and policies change from time to time so some information on older posts can very easily be dated. If you have any questions or are unclear on any of the subject matters addressed or discussed on this site, please consult a licensed legal professional. Views presented in the comments and outside links do not necessarily reflect those of the website author. All external links on this website to articles and documents are external and provided for informational purposes only. They have no relation to the author of this website unless specified otherwise.

This website is independent of Akrivis Law Group, PLLC and any statements of opinion posted on this website are therefore not to be considered positions of Akrivis Law Group, PLLC.

Quotations and linkages do not imply any type of endorsement.

Copyright 2023 Farhad R. Alavi.

All rights reserved.

US Sanctions Law Blog

%d bloggers like this: