The Great Sanctions Shipping Saga

It has been a number of years that the United States has been chasing down the Iranian shipping industry. Some years ago, OFAC designated the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) and a number of Iranian vessels on the SDN list.  Last week, the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (the IFCA) went into effect. It is part of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (the “2013 NDAA”). This very well may be the most potent blow against Iran’s shipping (and in large part economy), by placing severe sanctions on third country entities engaging in certain significant dealings with Iran’s energy, shipping, and shipbuilding sectors.  Notably, there are certain exceptions for food, medicine, and medical supplies, though it remains to be see if these humanitarian goods do not [again] become a victim of companies shunning even those transactions related to Iran that are legal out of a fear of violating the law.

There has been significant talk of Iran re-flagging vessels and playing a game of cat and mouse against the shipping world. Notably, this article in Forbes by Claudia Rosset, was very interesting.  Titled Have Tehran’s Tankers Hijacked the Tanzanian Flag?, the piece is definitely informative, but I am not sure it is fully an article and not entirely an editorial.  That said, it does illustrate the practices that the Iranian shipping industry has by engaged in by many accounts.

One key question is – do the parties mentioned in the article, e.g., the Tanzanian maritime authorities, the parties they have apparently outsourced their vessel registration to, etc. have the requisite sophistication to interpret such exceptionally esoteric laws as the IFCA? My thoughts in reading this law is that, as somebody with as many years of experience on sanctions law as I do, these regulations are exceptionally complicated.  I can only imagine what they are like for lawyers outside the trade bar, much less non-lawyers, and non-lawyers who are not native English speakers, such as many of the folks in the international shipping industry.

Relatively very few practitioners likely have a detailed, thorough understanding of these laws.  As such, I can see a situation where many are still violating these regulations, not intentionally necessarily.  This begs the question – is the US State Department going to go after all these violators?  Will and if so, how will these companies be brought into compliance? 

Companies should educate themselves on this law.  As I have often said, “we do not deal with Iran” is a very easy, but intellectually lazy answer.  Given Iran’s reportedly wide use of front companies, it is critical that companies enact robust compliance programs that are more than just skin deep – screening and doing due diligence (and appropriately documenting it) on their potential counterparties, among other measures.  Again, while exposure does naturally vary based on the type of business and other related facts, this matter does highlight the fact that compliance is not a luxury but a necessity for companies in the international trade realm.

Advertisements

An international trade and regulatory lawyer.

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Akrivis Law Group, PLLC
(202)686-4859
Washington, DC
E-Mail

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 90 other followers

DISCLAIMER
This website aims to provide notes and commentary on international legal, business, and political developments in economic and other sanctions. It is intended solely for information and entertainment purposes and should in no way be construed as legal advice. If you have any questions or are unclear on any of the subject matters addressed or discussed on this site, please consult a licensed legal professional. Views presented in the comments and outside links do not necessarily reflect those of the website author. All external links on this website to articles and documents are external and provided for informational purposes only. They have no relation to the author of this website unless specified otherwise.

This website is independent of Akrivis Law Group, PLLC and any statements of opinion posted on this website are therefore not to be considered positions of Akrivis Law Group, PLLC.

Quotations and linkages do not imply any type of endorsement.

Copyright 2017 Farhad R. Alavi.
All rights reserved.
US Sanctions Law Blog USSanctions.com

%d bloggers like this: